Demographics details for Taylorsville, NC vs Mayo, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, NC vs Mayo, FL.
Data | Taylorsville | Mayo |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,298 | 1,075 |
Median Age | 53.7 years | 30.8 years |
Median Income | $43,681 | $40,511 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mayo
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 2,298, compared to 1,075 in Mayo.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 30.8 years in Mayo.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $43,681 compared to $40,511 in Mayo.
- In Mayo, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Taylorsville and Mayo at 12%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Taylorsville and Mayo at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Mayo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Mayo |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 63 |
White | 86 | 9 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mayo
- In Mayo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 63% compared to 8% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 9% in Mayo.
- Both Taylorsville and Mayo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Mayo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mayo at 9%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Mayo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Mayo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.6% |
Depression | 25.6% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 23.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mayo
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Mayo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 25.6% compared to 20.4% in Mayo.
- Mayo has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 21.5% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Mayo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 37.8% compared to 37.1% in Mayo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mayo at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Mayo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (27) | 8.1% (87) |
High School Diploma | 26.1% (599) | 29.1% (313) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (444) | 20.7% (223) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (252) | 9.2% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mayo
- In Mayo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.1% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Mayo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.1% compared to 26.1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mayo at 20.7%, compared to 19.3% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 9.2% in Mayo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.