Demographics details for Taylorsville, NC vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, NC vs Hobbs, NM.
| Data | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,298 | 39,648 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,681 | $63,804 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 2,298 in Taylorsville.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $43,681 in Taylorsville.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 12% in Taylorsville.
- Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 6 |
| White | 86 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorsville at 8% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Taylorsville.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 25.6% compared to 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 21.5% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 37.8% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (27) | 2.2% (856) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (599) | 15.9% (6,312) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (444) | 26.2% (10,381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (252) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 19.3% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.