Demographics details for Taylorsville, KY vs Kaysville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, KY vs Kaysville, UT.
Data | Taylorsville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,292 | 32,761 |
Median Age | 31.5 years | 32.1 years |
Median Income | $45,060 | $121,867 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Kaysville
- The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 1,292 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Kaysville is higher at 32.1 years, compared to 31.5 years in Taylorsville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $45,060 in Taylorsville.
- In Kaysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 75 | 88 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorsville at 4% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kaysville at 88% compared to 75% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 3% compared to 1% in Kaysville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 5% in Kaysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 11% compared to 6% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Kaysville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.7% |
Depression | 27.6% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 11.4% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Kaysville
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.6% compared to 23.7% in Kaysville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 19.9% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.6% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 37.2% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 0.4% (141) |
High School Diploma | 22.1% (285) | 6.1% (1,986) |
Less than High School | 22.1% (285) | 2.6% (859) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (108) | 28.5% (9,340) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Kaysville
- In Kaysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 8.4% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.