Demographics details for Taylorsville, GA vs Mcallen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, GA vs Mcallen, TX.
Data | Taylorsville | Mcallen |
---|---|---|
Population | 258 | 144,579 |
Median Age | 56.7 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $41,250 | $56,326 |
Married Families | 62.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mcallen
- The population in Mcallen is higher at 144,579, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 56.7 years compared to 32.9 years in Mcallen.
- Mcallen has a higher median income of $56,326, compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 62.0% compared to 36.0% in Mcallen.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcallen at 15%, compared to 10% in Taylorsville.
- Mcallen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Mcallen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Mcallen |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 82 | -16 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 86 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 26 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mcallen
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Mcallen at 1%.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to -16% in Mcallen.
- Both Taylorsville and Mcallen have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Mcallen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 86%, compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcallen at 26%, compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Mcallen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Mcallen |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.6% |
Depression | 24.1% | 18.6% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 40.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mcallen
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Mcallen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 24.1% compared to 18.6% in Mcallen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 17.8% compared to 13.5% in Mcallen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Mcallen.
- Mcallen has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 32.5% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 12.0% in Mcallen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Mcallen |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2) | 1.6% (2,361) |
High School Diploma | 24.8% (64) | 10.4% (15,087) |
Less than High School | 51.2% (132) | 25.5% (36,844) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (58) | 19.3% (27,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Mcallen
- In Mcallen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 24.8% compared to 10.4% in Mcallen.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 51.2% compared to 25.5% in Mcallen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 19.3% in Mcallen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.