Demographics details for Taylor, TX vs South salt lake, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, TX vs South salt lake, UT.
Data | Taylor | South salt lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,975 | 26,003 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $66,626 | $57,125 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs South salt lake
- The population in South salt lake is higher at 26,003, compared to 16,975 in Taylor.
- Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
- Taylor has a higher median income of $66,626 compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylor at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
- The poverty level is identical in both Taylor and South salt lake at 10%.
- South salt lake has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Taylor.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs South salt lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylor | South salt lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 5 |
White | 30 | 43 |
Asian | 1 | 10 |
Hispanic | 41 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs South salt lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylor at 8% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South salt lake at 43% compared to 30% in Taylor.
- In South salt lake, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 41% compared to 30% in South salt lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylor at 19% compared to 9% in South salt lake.
- In South salt lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Taylor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylor | South salt lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 12.9% |
Depression | 25.4% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 34.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Taylor.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South salt lake at 26.6% versus 25.4% in Taylor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylor at 16.6% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylor at 15.6% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylor at 38.0% compared to 34.2% in South salt lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylor | South salt lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (135) | 1.4% (374) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (3,551) | 16.1% (4,185) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (3,497) | 16.8% (4,371) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (1,886) | 18.9% (4,906) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Taylor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
- More residents in Taylor have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in South salt lake.
- In South salt lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 11.1% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.