Demographics details for Taylor, TX vs Cedarbluff, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, TX vs Cedarbluff, MS.
| Data | Taylor | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,975 | 170 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,626 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs Cedarbluff
- In Taylor, the population is higher at 16,975, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
- The median age in Cedarbluff is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.6 years in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher median income of $66,626 compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
- In Cedarbluff, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 38.0% in Taylor.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedarbluff at 15%, compared to 10% in Taylor.
- Cedarbluff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Taylor.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs Cedarbluff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylor | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 25 |
| White | 30 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 41 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Cedarbluff
- In Cedarbluff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 8% in Taylor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedarbluff at 70% compared to 30% in Taylor.
- Both Taylor and Cedarbluff have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 41% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylor at 19% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylor at 1% compared to 0% in Cedarbluff.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylor | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Cedarbluff
- More residents in Taylor report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylor at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylor at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylor at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylor at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylor | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (135) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (3,551) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,497) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (1,886) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Cedarbluff
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents in Taylor have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.