Demographics details for Taylor, TX vs Bridgeport, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, TX vs Bridgeport, CT.

Data Taylor Bridgeport
Population 16,975 148,377
Median Age 40.6 years 37.5 years
Median Income $66,626 $54,440
Married Families 38.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.4

Population Comparison: Taylor vs Bridgeport

  • The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 16,975 in Taylor.
  • Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
  • Taylor has a higher median income of $66,626 compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylor at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 12%, compared to 10% in Taylor.
  • Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Taylor.

Demographics

Demographics Taylor vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylor Bridgeport
Black 8 22
White 30 26
Asian 1 7
Hispanic 41 36
Two or More Races 19 9
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 8% in Taylor.
  • Taylor has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
  • In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Taylor.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 41% compared to 36% in Bridgeport.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Taylor at 19% compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylor at 1% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylor Bridgeport
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.4% 13.3%
Depression 25.4% 18.2%
Smoking 16.6% 18.2%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 13.7%
Obesity 38.0% 32.7%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Bridgeport

  • More residents in Taylor report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Taylor at 25.4% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Taylor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Taylor at 15.6% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Taylor at 38.0% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylor Bridgeport
No Schooling 0.8% (135) 2.5% (3,659)
High School Diploma 20.9% (3,551) 18.7% (27,806)
Less than High School 20.6% (3,497) 23.9% (35,520)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (1,886) 16.8% (24,999)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.8% in Taylor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 20.6% in Taylor.
  • In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.1% in Taylor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.