Demographics details for Taylor, PA vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, PA vs Warner robins, GA.
| Data | Taylor | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,251 | 82,175 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,667 | $63,678 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 6,251 in Taylor.
- Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678, compared to $57,667 in Taylor.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- The unemployment rate in Taylor is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylor | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 40 |
| White | 76 | 42 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 15% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- Both Taylor and Warner robins have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Taylor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylor | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Warner robins
- More residents in Taylor report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylor at 24.8% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylor at 22.9% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylor at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 34.6% in Taylor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylor | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (42) | 0.4% (335) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,753) | 14.9% (12,260) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (963) | 7.0% (5,714) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (951) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- More residents in Taylor have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.