Demographics details for Taylor, PA vs Cedar falls, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, PA vs Cedar falls, IA.
| Data | Taylor | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,251 | 40,746 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,667 | $71,011 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs Cedar falls
- The population in Cedar falls is higher at 40,746, compared to 6,251 in Taylor.
- Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011, compared to $57,667 in Taylor.
- In Cedar falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
- The unemployment rate in Taylor is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylor | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 76 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Cedar falls
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylor and Cedar falls at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar falls at 90% compared to 76% in Taylor.
- In Cedar falls, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 15% compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylor at 7% compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylor and Cedar falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylor | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 22.2% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Cedar falls
- More residents in Taylor report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylor at 24.8% compared to 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylor at 22.9% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.8% in Taylor.
- Cedar falls has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 34.6% in Taylor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylor | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (42) | 0.1% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,753) | 9.6% (3,893) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (963) | 2.8% (1,147) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (951) | 26.8% (10,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Cedar falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- More residents in Taylor have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- In Cedar falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 15.2% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.