Demographics details for Taylor, MI vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, MI vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Taylor | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,258 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,352 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs Stillwater
- In Taylor, the population is higher at 62,258, compared to 49,160 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Taylor has a higher median income of $59,352 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylor at 33.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 12% in Taylor.
- The unemployment rate in Taylor is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylor | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 5 |
| White | 63 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylor at 21% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 72% compared to 63% in Taylor.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 8% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 7% in Taylor.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Taylor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylor | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 23.8% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.7% in Taylor.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 25.0% in Taylor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylor at 23.8% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylor at 18.0% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 34.4% in Taylor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylor at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylor | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (629) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (14,189) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (10,693) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (6,622) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Taylor have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 10.6% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.