Demographics details for Tappahannock, VA vs Ashland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tappahannock, VA vs Ashland, OH.
Data | Tappahannock | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,192 | 19,015 |
Median Age | 48.2 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $40,703 | $56,040 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Tappahannock vs Ashland
- The population in Ashland is higher at 19,015, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
- Residents in Tappahannock have a higher median age of 48.2 years compared to 38.8 years in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $56,040, compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
- In Ashland, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Tappahannock.
Demographics
Demographics Tappahannock vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tappahannock | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 2 |
White | 51 | 91 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tappahannock vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tappahannock at 42% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashland at 91% compared to 51% in Tappahannock.
- Both Tappahannock and Ashland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Tappahannock and Ashland at 2%.
- Both Tappahannock and Ashland have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tappahannock and Ashland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tappahannock | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.1% |
Depression | 22.4% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 44.7% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tappahannock vs Ashland
- More residents in Tappahannock report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Ashland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashland at 24.6% versus 22.4% in Tappahannock.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Tappahannock and Ashland at 20.6%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 18.1% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tappahannock at 44.7% compared to 38.7% in Ashland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashland at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Tappahannock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tappahannock | Ashland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (28) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (411) | 23.0% (4,380) |
Less than High School | 8.4% (185) | 12.3% (2,337) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (309) | 16.6% (3,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tappahannock vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
- In Ashland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 18.8% in Tappahannock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 12.3%, compared to 8.4% in Tappahannock.
- In Ashland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.