Demographics details for Tampa, FL vs Fountain hills, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tampa, FL vs Fountain hills, AZ.
Data | Tampa | Fountain hills |
---|---|---|
Population | 398,173 | 23,785 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 60.2 years |
Median Income | $66,802 | $100,317 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Tampa vs Fountain hills
- In Tampa, the population is higher at 398,173, compared to 23,785 in Fountain hills.
- The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 35.5 years in Tampa.
- Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317, compared to $66,802 in Tampa.
- In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 31.0% in Tampa.
- Tampa has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
- The unemployment rate in Tampa is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.
Demographics
Demographics Tampa vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tampa | Fountain hills |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 2 |
White | 35 | 89 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 26 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tampa vs Fountain hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tampa at 21% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 35% in Tampa.
- The Asian population is larger in Tampa at 5% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tampa at 26% compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tampa at 13% compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tampa and Fountain hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tampa | Fountain hills |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 8.0% |
Depression | 17.6% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 26.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tampa vs Fountain hills
- More residents in Tampa report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.1% in Fountain hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain hills at 19.7% versus 17.6% in Tampa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tampa at 18.0% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 15.8% in Tampa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tampa at 31.6% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tampa at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tampa | Fountain hills |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (4,784) | 0.4% (88) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (51,749) | 11.7% (2,782) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (48,642) | 3.7% (876) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.7% (114,410) | 42.2% (10,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tampa vs Fountain hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Tampa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tampa hold a high school diploma at 13.0% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
- More residents in Tampa have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
- In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 28.7% in Tampa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.