Demographics details for Tampa, FL vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tampa, FL vs Fort atkinson, WI.
Data | Tampa | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 398,173 | 12,412 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $66,802 | $72,215 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Tampa vs Fort atkinson
- In Tampa, the population is higher at 398,173, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.5 years in Tampa.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $66,802 in Tampa.
- In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 31.0% in Tampa.
- Tampa has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- The unemployment rate in Tampa is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Tampa vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tampa | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | Data is updating |
White | 35 | 89 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tampa vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tampa at 21% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 35% in Tampa.
- The Asian population is larger in Tampa at 5% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tampa at 26% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tampa at 13% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tampa and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tampa | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.2% |
Depression | 17.6% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tampa vs Fort atkinson
- More residents in Tampa report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 17.6% in Tampa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tampa at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 15.8% in Tampa.
- Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 31.6% in Tampa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Tampa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tampa | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (4,784) | 1.3% (160) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (51,749) | 20.8% (2,578) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (48,642) | 12.9% (1,595) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.7% (114,410) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tampa vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Tampa.
- In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 13.0% in Tampa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 12.2% in Tampa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tampa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.7% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.