Demographics details for Tamaroa, IL vs River falls, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tamaroa, IL vs River falls, WI.
Data | Tamaroa | River falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 536 | 16,609 |
Median Age | 42.7 years | 26.8 years |
Median Income | $47,500 | $72,247 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Tamaroa vs River falls
- The population in River falls is higher at 16,609, compared to 536 in Tamaroa.
- Residents in Tamaroa have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 26.8 years in River falls.
- River falls has a higher median income of $72,247, compared to $47,500 in Tamaroa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tamaroa at 30.0% compared to 29.0% in River falls.
- Tamaroa has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in River falls.
- The unemployment rate in Tamaroa is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.5% in River falls.
Demographics
Demographics Tamaroa vs River falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tamaroa | River falls |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 100 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tamaroa vs River falls
- In River falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- Tamaroa has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 91% in River falls.
- In River falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Tamaroa.
- River falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in River falls at 4%, compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tamaroa and River falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tamaroa | River falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.6% |
Depression | 22.2% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 24.3% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tamaroa vs River falls
- More residents in Tamaroa report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in River falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in River falls at 23.6% versus 22.2% in Tamaroa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tamaroa at 17.5% compared to 14.7% in River falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in River falls at 24.3% compared to 18.7% in Tamaroa.
- River falls has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 35.3% in Tamaroa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tamaroa at 31.0% compared to 9.0% in River falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tamaroa | River falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.1% (124) | 8.9% (1,480) |
Less than High School | 19.4% (104) | 2.6% (439) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (26) | 21.9% (3,640) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tamaroa vs River falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Tamaroa have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in River falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tamaroa hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 8.9% in River falls.
- More residents in Tamaroa have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 2.6% in River falls.
- In River falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 4.9% in Tamaroa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.