Demographics details for Tamaroa, IL vs Covina, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tamaroa, IL vs Covina, CA.
| Data | Tamaroa | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 536 | 49,489 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,500 | $89,650 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Tamaroa vs Covina
- The population in Covina is higher at 49,489, compared to 536 in Tamaroa.
- Residents in Tamaroa have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 37.6 years in Covina.
- Covina has a higher median income of $89,650, compared to $47,500 in Tamaroa.
- In Covina, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Tamaroa.
- The poverty level is identical in both Tamaroa and Covina at 12%.
- Covina has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 5.2% in Tamaroa.
Demographics
Demographics Tamaroa vs Covina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tamaroa | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 100 | 18 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 63 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Tamaroa vs Covina
- In Covina, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- Tamaroa has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 18% in Covina.
- In Covina, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Tamaroa.
- Covina has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covina at 19%, compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- In Covina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tamaroa | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tamaroa vs Covina
- More residents in Tamaroa report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Covina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tamaroa at 22.2% compared to 15.9% in Covina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tamaroa at 17.5% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tamaroa at 18.7% compared to 15.6% in Covina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tamaroa at 35.3% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tamaroa at 31.0% compared to 12.0% in Covina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tamaroa | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 1.5% (753) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (124) | 17.4% (8,620) |
| Less than High School | 19.4% (104) | 17.2% (8,533) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (26) | 18.7% (9,254) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tamaroa vs Covina
- In Covina, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Tamaroa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tamaroa hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 17.4% in Covina.
- More residents in Tamaroa have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 17.2% in Covina.
- In Covina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 4.9% in Tamaroa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.