Demographics details for Tallulah, LA vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tallulah, LA vs Forest park, GA.
Data | Tallulah | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,946 | 19,400 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $31,070 | $41,837 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Tallulah vs Forest park
- The population in Forest park is higher at 19,400, compared to 5,946 in Tallulah.
- Residents in Tallulah have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher median income of $41,837, compared to $31,070 in Tallulah.
- In Forest park, the percentage of married families is higher at 23.0%, compared to 21.0% in Tallulah.
- Tallulah has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate in Tallulah is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Tallulah vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tallulah | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 55 |
White | 11 | 8 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 1 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tallulah vs Forest park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tallulah at 86% compared to 55% in Forest park.
- Tallulah has a higher percentage of White residents at 11% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Tallulah.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Tallulah.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 2% in Tallulah.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tallulah and Forest park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tallulah | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 24.5% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 19.5% | 16.0% |
Depression | 26.5% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 32.8% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tallulah vs Forest park
- More residents in Tallulah report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tallulah at 26.5% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tallulah at 32.8% compared to 22.7% in Forest park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest park at 13.3% compared to 12.7% in Tallulah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tallulah at 49.5% compared to 43.0% in Forest park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tallulah at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tallulah | Forest park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (84) | 2.6% (504) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,115) | 18.4% (3,567) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (916) | 21.7% (4,202) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (555) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tallulah vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.4% in Tallulah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tallulah hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 15.4% in Tallulah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tallulah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.