Demographics details for Tallulah, LA vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tallulah, LA vs College park, MD.
Data | Tallulah | College park |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,946 | 34,190 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 21.6 years |
Median Income | $31,070 | $76,973 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Tallulah vs College park
- The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 5,946 in Tallulah.
- Residents in Tallulah have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $31,070 in Tallulah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tallulah at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- Tallulah has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 10% in College park.
- College park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.0% in Tallulah.
Demographics
Demographics Tallulah vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tallulah | College park |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 23 |
White | 11 | 39 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | 1 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tallulah vs College park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tallulah at 86% compared to 23% in College park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in College park at 39% compared to 11% in Tallulah.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Tallulah.
- College park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 1% in Tallulah.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in College park at 7%, compared to 2% in Tallulah.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tallulah and College park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tallulah | College park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 24.5% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 19.5% | 10.0% |
Depression | 26.5% | 15.4% |
Smoking | 32.8% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tallulah vs College park
- More residents in Tallulah report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tallulah at 26.5% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tallulah at 32.8% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in College park at 12.8% compared to 12.7% in Tallulah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tallulah at 49.5% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tallulah at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tallulah | College park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (84) | 1.9% (657) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,115) | 6.4% (2,199) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (916) | 9.4% (3,210) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (555) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tallulah vs College park
- In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.4% in Tallulah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tallulah hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Tallulah have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 9.3% in Tallulah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.