Demographics details for Talladega, AL vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Talladega, AL vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Talladega | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,674 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $37,945 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Talladega vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 14,674 in Talladega.
- Residents in Talladega have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $37,945 in Talladega.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Talladega.
- Talladega has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Talladega.
Demographics
Demographics Talladega vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Talladega | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 15 |
| White | 36 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Talladega vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Talladega at 55% compared to 15% in Fairfield.
- Talladega has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Talladega.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 6% in Talladega.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 3% in Talladega.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Talladega and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Talladega | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 45.2% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Talladega vs Fairfield
- More residents in Talladega report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Talladega at 22.7% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Talladega at 24.4% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 13.2% in Talladega.
- Obesity rates are higher in Talladega at 45.2% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Talladega at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Talladega | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (273) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (2,827) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (3,843) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (1,374) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Talladega vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.9% in Talladega.
- A higher percentage of residents in Talladega hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Talladega have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 9.4% in Talladega.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.