Demographics details for Tahoka, TX vs Springdale, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tahoka, TX vs Springdale, AR.
| Data | Tahoka | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,413 | 87,672 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $41,282 | $59,985 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Tahoka vs Springdale
- The population in Springdale is higher at 87,672, compared to 2,413 in Tahoka.
- Residents in Tahoka have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 32.1 years in Springdale.
- Springdale has a higher median income of $59,985, compared to $41,282 in Tahoka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tahoka at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Springdale.
- Tahoka has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Springdale.
- The unemployment rate in Tahoka is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.7% in Springdale.
Demographics
Demographics Tahoka vs Springdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tahoka | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 28 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 22 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Tahoka vs Springdale
- In Springdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Tahoka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springdale at 36% compared to 28% in Tahoka.
- In Springdale, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Tahoka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tahoka at 48% compared to 38% in Springdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tahoka at 22% compared to 19% in Springdale.
- In Springdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Tahoka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tahoka | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 43.8% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tahoka vs Springdale
- More residents in Tahoka report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.0% in Springdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springdale at 25.2% versus 24.5% in Tahoka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tahoka at 22.8% compared to 20.4% in Springdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tahoka at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Springdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tahoka at 43.8% compared to 35.5% in Springdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tahoka at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Springdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tahoka | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (36) | 2.6% (2,317) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (412) | 14.5% (12,683) |
| Less than High School | 28.3% (684) | 26.6% (23,284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (335) | 14.0% (12,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tahoka vs Springdale
- In Springdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.5% in Tahoka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tahoka hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 14.5% in Springdale.
- More residents in Tahoka have less than a high school education at 28.3% compared to 26.6% in Springdale.
- In Springdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 13.9% in Tahoka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.