Demographics details for Tahoka, TX vs Central square, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Tahoka, TX vs Central square, NY.

Data Tahoka Central square
Population 2,413 1,852
Median Age 37.7 years 41.0 years
Median Income $41,282 $58,824
Married Families 42.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 15% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.2

Population Comparison: Tahoka vs Central square

  • In Tahoka, the population is higher at 2,413, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
  • The median age in Central square is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 37.7 years in Tahoka.
  • Central square has a higher median income of $58,824, compared to $41,282 in Tahoka.
  • In Central square, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 42.0% in Tahoka.
  • Tahoka has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Central square.
  • Central square has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Tahoka.

Demographics

Demographics Tahoka vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Tahoka Central square
Black 2 1
White 28 97
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 48 Data is updating
Two or More Races 22 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Tahoka vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tahoka at 2% compared to 1% in Central square.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 28% in Tahoka.
  • Both Tahoka and Central square have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Tahoka at 48% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Tahoka at 22% compared to 2% in Central square.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tahoka and Central square at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Tahoka Central square
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 11.8%
Depression 24.5% 26.8%
Smoking 22.8% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 19.3%
Obesity 43.8% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Tahoka vs Central square

  • More residents in Tahoka report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Central square.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 24.5% in Tahoka.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Tahoka at 22.8% compared to 21.2% in Central square.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central square at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Tahoka.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Tahoka at 43.8% compared to 40.3% in Central square.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Tahoka at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Central square.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Tahoka Central square
No Schooling 1.5% (36) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 17.1% (412) 14.2% (263)
Less than High School 28.3% (684) 11.0% (204)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (335) 19.2% (356)

Education Levels Comparison: Tahoka vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of residents in Tahoka have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Tahoka hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
  • More residents in Tahoka have less than a high school education at 28.3% compared to 11.0% in Central square.
  • In Central square, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 13.9% in Tahoka.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.