Demographics details for Tahlequah, OK vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tahlequah, OK vs New london, CT.
Data | Tahlequah | New london |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,828 | 27,980 |
Median Age | 30.5 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $49,444 | $56,237 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Tahlequah vs New london
- The population in New london is higher at 27,980, compared to 16,828 in Tahlequah.
- The median age in New london is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 30.5 years in Tahlequah.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237, compared to $49,444 in Tahlequah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tahlequah at 30.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- Tahlequah has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in New london.
- The unemployment rate in Tahlequah is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics Tahlequah vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tahlequah | New london |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 17 |
White | 43 | 41 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 9 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 11 |
American Indian | 29 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tahlequah vs New london
- In New london, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 2% in Tahlequah.
- Tahlequah has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 41% in New london.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Tahlequah.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 9% in Tahlequah.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tahlequah at 16% compared to 11% in New london.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tahlequah at 29% compared to 0% in New london.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tahlequah | New london |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.5% |
Depression | 27.1% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 22.9% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tahlequah vs New london
- More residents in Tahlequah report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tahlequah at 27.1% compared to 23.3% in New london.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tahlequah at 22.9% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New london at 15.2% compared to 13.5% in Tahlequah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tahlequah at 44.1% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tahlequah at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tahlequah | New london |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (232) | 1.4% (399) |
High School Diploma | 11.6% (1,956) | 16.0% (4,487) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (1,742) | 13.7% (3,830) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.1% (3,381) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tahlequah vs New london
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Tahlequah and New london at 1.4%.
- In New london, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 11.6% in Tahlequah.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New london at 13.7%, compared to 10.4% in Tahlequah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tahlequah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.