Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Tacoma | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221,776 | 242 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,085 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Summerfield
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Tacoma and Summerfield at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Summerfield at 13%, compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tacoma | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 97 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tacoma at 11% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tacoma at 12% compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tacoma | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Summerfield
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 24.2% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Summerfield has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tacoma | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 17.4%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.