Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Shirley, NY.
Data | Tacoma | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Population | 221,776 | 26,498 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $79,085 | $109,821 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Shirley
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 26,498 in Shirley.
- The median age in Shirley is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- In Shirley, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Shirley.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tacoma | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 8 |
White | 53 | 56 |
Asian | 9 | 5 |
Hispanic | 12 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Shirley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tacoma at 11% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shirley at 56% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 5% in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 0% in Shirley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tacoma | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.7% |
Depression | 26.2% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Shirley
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tacoma at 34.6% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tacoma | Shirley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 2.1% (555) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 22.2% (5,874) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 13.4% (3,542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.6% in Tacoma.
- In Shirley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shirley at 13.4%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.