Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Pell city, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Pell city, AL.
Data | Tacoma | Pell city |
---|---|---|
Population | 221,776 | 13,638 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 38.7 years |
Median Income | $79,085 | $71,027 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Pell city
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 13,638 in Pell city.
- The median age in Pell city is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085 compared to $71,027 in Pell city.
- In Pell city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Pell city at 12%, compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Pell city.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Pell city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tacoma | Pell city |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 17 |
White | 53 | 78 |
Asian | 9 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Pell city
- In Pell city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pell city at 78% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 2% in Pell city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tacoma at 12% compared to 1% in Pell city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 2% in Pell city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 0% in Pell city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tacoma | Pell city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 13.2% |
Depression | 26.2% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 41.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Pell city
- In Pell city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.9% in Tacoma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 24.7% in Pell city.
- Pell city has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
- Pell city has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Tacoma and Pell city at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tacoma | Pell city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 0.8% (109) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 18.9% (2,574) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 12.9% (1,759) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 13.9% (1,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Pell city
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Pell city.
- In Pell city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pell city at 12.9%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 13.9% in Pell city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.