Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Murrayville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Murrayville, GA.
Data | Tacoma | Murrayville |
---|---|---|
Population | 221,776 | 17,470 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 45.3 years |
Median Income | $79,085 | $80,987 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Murrayville
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 17,470 in Murrayville.
- The median age in Murrayville is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Murrayville has a higher median income of $80,987, compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- In Murrayville, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Murrayville.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.2% in Murrayville.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Murrayville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tacoma | Murrayville |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 53 | 79 |
Asian | 9 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Murrayville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tacoma at 11% compared to 0% in Murrayville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murrayville at 79% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 1% in Murrayville.
- Murrayville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 6% in Murrayville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 0% in Murrayville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tacoma | Murrayville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 26.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 34.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Murrayville
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Murrayville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 0.0% in Murrayville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tacoma at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Murrayville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Murrayville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tacoma at 34.6% compared to 0.0% in Murrayville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Murrayville at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tacoma | Murrayville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 1.6% (284) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 16.3% (2,849) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 17.3% (3,024) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 24.6% (4,298) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Murrayville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Tacoma and Murrayville at 1.6%.
- In Murrayville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Murrayville at 17.3%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Murrayville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.