Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Heyburn, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Heyburn, ID.
Data | Tacoma | Heyburn |
---|---|---|
Population | 221,776 | 3,640 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 26.5 years |
Median Income | $79,085 | $61,443 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Heyburn
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 3,640 in Heyburn.
- Residents in Tacoma have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 26.5 years in Heyburn.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085 compared to $61,443 in Heyburn.
- In Heyburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is identical in both Tacoma and Heyburn at 11%.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Heyburn.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Heyburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tacoma | Heyburn |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 53 | 70 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tacoma at 11% compared to 0% in Heyburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heyburn at 70% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 0% in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 3% in Heyburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tacoma and Heyburn at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tacoma | Heyburn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 13.4% |
Depression | 26.2% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Heyburn
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.8% in Heyburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 22.9% in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Tacoma and Heyburn at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tacoma | Heyburn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 0.4% (15) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 20.5% (745) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 19.1% (694) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 12.3% (447) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Heyburn.
- In Heyburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heyburn at 19.1%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 12.3% in Heyburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.