Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Hackensack, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Hackensack, NJ.
| Data | Tacoma | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221,776 | 45,633 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $79,085 | $79,133 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Hackensack
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 45,633 in Hackensack.
- The median age in Hackensack is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Hackensack has a higher median income of $79,133, compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tacoma at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Hackensack.
- Tacoma has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Hackensack.
- Hackensack has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Hackensack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tacoma | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 20 |
| White | 53 | 17 |
| Asian | 9 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Hackensack
- In Hackensack, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 17% in Hackensack.
- In Hackensack, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 9% in Tacoma.
- Hackensack has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- Both Tacoma and Hackensack have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 0% in Hackensack.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tacoma | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 15.7% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 30.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Hackensack
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Hackensack.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 15.7% in Hackensack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tacoma at 15.4% compared to 13.5% in Hackensack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Hackensack.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tacoma at 34.6% compared to 30.5% in Hackensack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Hackensack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tacoma | Hackensack |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 3.3% (1,520) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 17.2% (7,861) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 19.0% (8,680) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 31.8% (14,527) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Hackensack
- In Hackensack, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.6% in Tacoma.
- In Hackensack, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hackensack at 19.0%, compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Hackensack, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.