Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Fort leonard wood, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Fort leonard wood, MO.
| Data | Tacoma | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221,776 | 15,615 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 20.6 years |
| Median Income | $79,085 | $64,890 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Fort leonard wood
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 15,615 in Fort leonard wood.
- Residents in Tacoma have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085 compared to $64,890 in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tacoma at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Tacoma has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Fort leonard wood.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Fort leonard wood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tacoma | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 18 |
| White | 53 | 35 |
| Asian | 9 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 18 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 35% in Fort leonard wood.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 4% in Fort leonard wood.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort leonard wood at 18%, compared to 13% in Tacoma.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tacoma at 2% compared to 1% in Fort leonard wood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tacoma | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 6.6% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 25.4% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.9% in Tacoma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 24.0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tacoma at 15.4% compared to 12.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tacoma at 34.6% compared to 30.7% in Fort leonard wood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tacoma | Fort leonard wood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 0.2% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 4.5% (700) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 0.8% (119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 9.3% (1,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Fort leonard wood
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
- More residents in Tacoma have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.