Demographics details for Syracuse, NY vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Syracuse, NY vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Syracuse | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 144,451 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $43,584 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Syracuse vs Washington
- In Syracuse, the population is higher at 144,451, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 31.9 years in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has a higher median income of $43,584 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 22.0% in Syracuse.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 0% in Syracuse.
- The unemployment rate in Syracuse is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.8% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Syracuse vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Syracuse | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 49 |
| White | 45 | 41 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Syracuse vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 29% in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has a higher percentage of White residents at 45% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Syracuse at 7% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Syracuse at 10% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Syracuse at 8% compared to 3% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Syracuse and Washington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Syracuse | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 26.9% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.6% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Syracuse vs Washington
- More residents in Syracuse report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Syracuse at 26.9% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Syracuse at 26.9% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 14.7% compared to 14.0% in Syracuse.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 42.6% in Syracuse.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Syracuse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Syracuse | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (2,595) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (18,391) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (20,347) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (26,759) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Syracuse vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Syracuse have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 12.7% in Syracuse.
- More residents in Syracuse have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Syracuse hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.