Demographics details for Sylvania, OH vs Pequot lakes, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, OH vs Pequot lakes, MN.
| Data | Sylvania | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,051 | 2,440 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $86,048 | $73,125 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Pequot lakes
- In Sylvania, the population is higher at 19,051, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
- Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 40.5 years in Pequot lakes.
- Sylvania has a higher median income of $86,048 compared to $73,125 in Pequot lakes.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sylvania at 46.0% compared to 41.0% in Pequot lakes.
- The poverty level is higher in Pequot lakes at 9%, compared to 5% in Sylvania.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Sylvania and Pequot lakes at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvania vs Pequot lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvania | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 94 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Pequot lakes
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sylvania at 2% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pequot lakes at 94% compared to 89% in Sylvania.
- The Asian population is larger in Sylvania at 3% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sylvania at 3% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sylvania at 3% compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
- In Pequot lakes, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvania | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Pequot lakes
- More residents in Sylvania report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pequot lakes at 23.3% versus 22.9% in Sylvania.
- Pequot lakes has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 13.5% in Sylvania.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Sylvania.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sylvania at 35.0% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvania | Pequot lakes |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (7) | 0.7% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (2,300) | 14.0% (341) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (587) | 3.4% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (6,680) | 20.7% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Pequot lakes
- In Pequot lakes, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Sylvania.
- In Pequot lakes, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 12.1% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pequot lakes at 3.4%, compared to 3.1% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 20.7% in Pequot lakes.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.