Demographics details for Sylvania, OH vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, OH vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Sylvania | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,051 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $86,048 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort thomas
- In Sylvania, the population is higher at 19,051, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
- Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $86,048 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sylvania at 46.0% compared to 45.0% in Fort thomas.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort thomas at 6%, compared to 5% in Sylvania.
- The unemployment rate in Sylvania is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvania vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvania | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 92 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort thomas
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sylvania and Fort thomas at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort thomas at 92% compared to 89% in Sylvania.
- The Asian population is larger in Sylvania at 3% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sylvania at 3% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort thomas at 4%, compared to 3% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sylvania and Fort thomas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvania | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort thomas
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Sylvania and Fort thomas at 15.5%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort thomas at 26.2% versus 22.9% in Sylvania.
- Fort thomas has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 13.5% in Sylvania.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sylvania at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sylvania at 35.0% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sylvania and Fort thomas at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvania | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (7) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (2,300) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (587) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (6,680) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort thomas at 3.3%, compared to 3.1% in Sylvania.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 35.1% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.