Demographics details for Sylvania, GA vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, GA vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Sylvania | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,602 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,682 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 2,602 in Sylvania.
- Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Sylvania is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvania vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvania | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 57 | 11 |
| White | 40 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Tacoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sylvania at 57% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tacoma at 53% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Sylvania.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvania | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Tacoma
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Sylvania and Tacoma at 18.9%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sylvania at 21.8% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sylvania at 40.5% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sylvania at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvania | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (8) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (704) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (485) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (271) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- More residents in Sylvania have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.