Environment details: Sylvania GA
Poor quality, local pollution reported.
Environment details: Lost hills CA
Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices.
Compare Environment: Sylvania GA vs Lost hills CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Sylvania | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 993 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Poor quality, local pollution reported. | Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.63 | 1.98 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 31 | 84 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sylvania vs Lost hills
- Both cities report the same water quality at 4/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Lost hills with an average index of 1.98 compared to 1.63 in Sylvania.
- Lost hills experiences more days with poor air quality at 84 compared to 31 in Sylvania.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.