Demographics details for Sylvania, GA vs Callaway, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, GA vs Callaway, MN.
| Data | Sylvania | Callaway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,602 | 173 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,682 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Callaway
- In Sylvania, the population is higher at 2,602, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 39.9 years in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- In Callaway, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Callaway.
- The unemployment rate in Sylvania is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvania vs Callaway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvania | Callaway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 57 | Data is updating |
| White | 40 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Callaway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sylvania at 57% compared to 0% in Callaway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Callaway at 46% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- Both Sylvania and Callaway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Callaway has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Callaway at 16%, compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- In Callaway, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvania | Callaway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 27.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 47.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Callaway
- More residents in Sylvania report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Callaway.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Callaway at 26.1% versus 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Callaway has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Callaway has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 40.5% in Sylvania.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvania | Callaway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (8) | 0.6% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (704) | 27.2% (47) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (485) | 22.0% (38) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (271) | 14.5% (25) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Callaway
- In Callaway, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- In Callaway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 27.1% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Callaway at 22.0%, compared to 18.6% in Sylvania.
- In Callaway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.