Demographics details for Sylvania, GA vs Ashville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, GA vs Ashville, OH.
| Data | Sylvania | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,602 | 4,689 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $36,682 | $60,293 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Ashville
- The population in Ashville is higher at 4,689, compared to 2,602 in Sylvania.
- Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 35.1 years in Ashville.
- Ashville has a higher median income of $60,293, compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- In Ashville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Ashville.
- The unemployment rate in Sylvania is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Ashville.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvania vs Ashville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvania | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 57 | 3 |
| White | 40 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Ashville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sylvania at 57% compared to 3% in Ashville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashville at 91% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- Both Sylvania and Ashville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- Both Sylvania and Ashville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sylvania and Ashville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvania | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Ashville
- More residents in Sylvania report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Ashville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashville at 24.6% versus 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sylvania at 21.8% compared to 20.6% in Ashville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashville at 18.7% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Ashville has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 40.5% in Sylvania.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashville at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvania | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (8) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (704) | 25.7% (1,206) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (485) | 10.2% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (271) | 8.4% (392) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Ashville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 25.7% in Ashville.
- More residents in Sylvania have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 10.2% in Ashville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 8.4% in Ashville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.