Demographics details for Sylvan beach, NY vs Turner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sylvan beach, NY vs Turner, OR.
| Data | Sylvan beach | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 885 | 2,422 |
| Median Age | 50.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $101,292 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sylvan beach vs Turner
- The population in Turner is higher at 2,422, compared to 885 in Sylvan beach.
- Residents in Sylvan beach have a higher median age of 50.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Turner.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292, compared to $48,125 in Sylvan beach.
- In Turner, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sylvan beach.
- Sylvan beach has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Turner.
- The unemployment rate in Sylvan beach is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Turner.
Demographics
Demographics Sylvan beach vs Turner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sylvan beach | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 77 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sylvan beach vs Turner
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sylvan beach and Turner at 0%.
- Sylvan beach has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 77% in Turner.
- In Turner, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sylvan beach.
- Turner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Sylvan beach.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Turner at 5%, compared to 3% in Sylvan beach.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sylvan beach at 1% compared to 0% in Turner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sylvan beach | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvan beach vs Turner
- More residents in Sylvan beach report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Turner.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Turner at 28.2% versus 26.8% in Sylvan beach.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sylvan beach at 24.0% compared to 13.7% in Turner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sylvan beach at 19.7% compared to 18.0% in Turner.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sylvan beach at 36.2% compared to 33.6% in Turner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sylvan beach at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Turner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sylvan beach | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (252) | 12.8% (311) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (128) | 9.2% (223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (138) | 23.3% (564) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sylvan beach vs Turner
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sylvan beach and Turner at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sylvan beach hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 12.8% in Turner.
- More residents in Sylvan beach have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 9.2% in Turner.
- In Turner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 15.6% in Sylvan beach.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.