Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs Stockholm, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs Stockholm, WI.

Data Sweetwater Stockholm
Population 10,408 82
Median Age 35.7 years 69.8 years
Median Income $44,306 $62,500
Married Families 32.0% 84.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.4 2.5

Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Stockholm

  • In Sweetwater, the population is higher at 10,408, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
  • The median age in Stockholm is higher at 69.8 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
  • Stockholm has a higher median income of $62,500, compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
  • In Stockholm, the percentage of married families is higher at 84.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
  • Sweetwater has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • The unemployment rate in Sweetwater is higher at 5.4%, compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.

Demographics

Demographics Sweetwater vs Stockholm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sweetwater Stockholm
Black 6 Data is updating
White 34 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 46 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Stockholm

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sweetwater at 6% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stockholm at 100% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
  • Both Sweetwater and Stockholm have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sweetwater at 46% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sweetwater at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sweetwater Stockholm
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 11.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 12.6%
Depression 24.2% 20.6%
Smoking 20.3% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 19.3%
Obesity 38.9% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Stockholm

  • More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 20.6% in Stockholm.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in Stockholm.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Sweetwater.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 38.6% in Stockholm.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stockholm at 26.0% compared to 21.0% in Sweetwater.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sweetwater Stockholm
No Schooling 1.9% (194) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.0% (1,666) 28.0% (23)
Less than High School 23.1% (2,408) 2.4% (2)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (733) 64.6% (53)

Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Stockholm

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
  • In Stockholm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
  • More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 23.1% compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
  • In Stockholm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.