Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs South holland, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs South holland, IL.
Data | Sweetwater | South holland |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,408 | 20,685 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 42.6 years |
Median Income | $44,306 | $79,567 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs South holland
- The population in South holland is higher at 20,685, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
- The median age in South holland is higher at 42.6 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- South holland has a higher median income of $79,567, compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- In South holland, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in South holland.
- The unemployment rate in Sweetwater is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.2% in South holland.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs South holland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sweetwater | South holland |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 83 |
White | 34 | 8 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 46 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs South holland
- In South holland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 8% in South holland.
- In South holland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sweetwater.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sweetwater at 46% compared to 5% in South holland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 3% in South holland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sweetwater at 1% compared to 0% in South holland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sweetwater | South holland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 10.9% |
Depression | 24.2% | 15.1% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 15.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs South holland
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.8% in South holland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 15.1% in South holland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 20.3% compared to 15.3% in South holland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in South holland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 37.3% in South holland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in South holland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sweetwater | South holland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (194) | 0.5% (94) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,666) | 15.5% (3,210) |
Less than High School | 23.1% (2,408) | 7.8% (1,623) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (733) | 20.0% (4,142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs South holland
- A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.5% in South holland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in South holland.
- More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 23.1% compared to 7.8% in South holland.
- In South holland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.