Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs Rosemead, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs Rosemead, CA.
| Data | Sweetwater | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,408 | 49,791 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 43.1 years |
| Median Income | $44,306 | $70,073 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Rosemead
- The population in Rosemead is higher at 49,791, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
- The median age in Rosemead is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- Rosemead has a higher median income of $70,073, compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- In Rosemead, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Rosemead.
- Rosemead has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.4% in Sweetwater.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs Rosemead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sweetwater | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 34 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 65 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Rosemead
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sweetwater at 6% compared to 1% in Rosemead.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to -4% in Rosemead.
- In Rosemead, the Asian population stands at 65%, greater than 0% in Sweetwater.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sweetwater at 46% compared to 32% in Rosemead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 5% in Rosemead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sweetwater and Rosemead at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sweetwater | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 12.2% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 11.0% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 21.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Rosemead
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.2% in Rosemead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 12.2% in Rosemead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 20.3% compared to 12.3% in Rosemead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 11.0% in Rosemead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 21.6% in Rosemead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Rosemead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sweetwater | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (194) | 10.4% (5,181) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,666) | 17.8% (8,852) |
| Less than High School | 23.1% (2,408) | 31.2% (15,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (733) | 16.5% (8,228) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.4% compared to 1.9% in Sweetwater.
- In Rosemead, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosemead at 31.2%, compared to 23.1% in Sweetwater.
- In Rosemead, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.