Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs Lodge, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs Lodge, SC.
| Data | Sweetwater | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,408 | 84 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $44,306 | $34,938 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lodge
- In Sweetwater, the population is higher at 10,408, compared to 84 in Lodge.
- The median age in Lodge is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher median income of $44,306 compared to $34,938 in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sweetwater and Lodge at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Sweetwater is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Lodge.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs Lodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sweetwater | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 34 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 46 | 61 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sweetwater at 6% compared to 5% in Lodge.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Sweetwater and Lodge at 34%.
- Both Sweetwater and Lodge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Lodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 46% in Sweetwater.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sweetwater at 1% compared to 0% in Lodge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sweetwater | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 45.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lodge
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Lodge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 22.4% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 20.3% in Sweetwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Lodge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 34.9% in Lodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lodge at 45.0% compared to 21.0% in Sweetwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sweetwater | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (194) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,666) | 60.7% (51) |
| Less than High School | 23.1% (2,408) | 26.2% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (733) | 8.3% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 60.7% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lodge at 26.2%, compared to 23.1% in Sweetwater.
- In Lodge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.