Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Sweetwater | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,408 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $44,306 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
- Residents in Sweetwater have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Sweetwater and Lancaster at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sweetwater and Lancaster at 15%.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 5.4% in Sweetwater.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sweetwater | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 21 |
| White | 34 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sweetwater and Lancaster at 46%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 13% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sweetwater and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sweetwater | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lancaster
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 20.3% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sweetwater | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (194) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,666) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 23.1% (2,408) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (733) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.9% in Sweetwater.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 23.1% compared to 21.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.