Demographics details for Swainsboro, GA vs Point of rocks, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Swainsboro, GA vs Point of rocks, MD.

Data Swainsboro Point of rocks
Population 7,583 2,360
Median Age 30.1 years 38.3 years
Median Income $44,491 $126,944
Married Families 25.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 24% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Swainsboro vs Point of rocks

  • In Swainsboro, the population is higher at 7,583, compared to 2,360 in Point of rocks.
  • The median age in Point of rocks is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
  • Point of rocks has a higher median income of $126,944, compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
  • In Point of rocks, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
  • The unemployment rate in Swainsboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Point of rocks.

Demographics

Demographics Swainsboro vs Point of rocks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Swainsboro Point of rocks
Black 57 13
White 33 57
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 4 15
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Swainsboro vs Point of rocks

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Swainsboro at 57% compared to 13% in Point of rocks.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Point of rocks at 57% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
  • In Point of rocks, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Swainsboro.
  • Point of rocks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Point of rocks at 9%, compared to 6% in Swainsboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Swainsboro and Point of rocks at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Swainsboro Point of rocks
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 7.6%
Depression 20.6% 19.7%
Smoking 22.6% 12.0%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 17.6%
Obesity 42.6% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Swainsboro vs Point of rocks

  • More residents in Swainsboro report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.4% in Point of rocks.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Swainsboro at 20.6% compared to 19.7% in Point of rocks.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Swainsboro at 22.6% compared to 12.0% in Point of rocks.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Point of rocks at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Swainsboro at 42.6% compared to 31.8% in Point of rocks.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Point of rocks.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Swainsboro Point of rocks
No Schooling 1.9% (147) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.7% (1,264) 17.3% (408)
Less than High School 11.6% (879) 5.0% (118)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.6% (500) 28.4% (670)

Education Levels Comparison: Swainsboro vs Point of rocks

  • A higher percentage of residents in Swainsboro have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Point of rocks.
  • In Point of rocks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Swainsboro.
  • More residents in Swainsboro have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.0% in Point of rocks.
  • In Point of rocks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.