Demographics details for Swainsboro, GA vs Montour falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Swainsboro, GA vs Montour falls, NY.

Data Swainsboro Montour falls
Population 7,583 1,583
Median Age 30.1 years 44.8 years
Median Income $44,491 $33,977
Married Families 25.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 24% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Swainsboro vs Montour falls

  • In Swainsboro, the population is higher at 7,583, compared to 1,583 in Montour falls.
  • The median age in Montour falls is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher median income of $44,491 compared to $33,977 in Montour falls.
  • In Montour falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 10% in Montour falls.
  • Montour falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Swainsboro.

Demographics

Demographics Swainsboro vs Montour falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Swainsboro Montour falls
Black 57 2
White 33 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 4 1
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Swainsboro vs Montour falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Swainsboro at 57% compared to 2% in Montour falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Montour falls at 92% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
  • Both Swainsboro and Montour falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Swainsboro at 4% compared to 1% in Montour falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Swainsboro at 6% compared to 4% in Montour falls.
  • In Montour falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Swainsboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Swainsboro Montour falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 11.3%
Depression 20.6% 25.1%
Smoking 22.6% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 19.5%
Obesity 42.6% 35.2%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Swainsboro vs Montour falls

  • More residents in Swainsboro report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Montour falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Montour falls at 25.1% versus 20.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Swainsboro at 22.6% compared to 21.1% in Montour falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Montour falls at 19.5% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Swainsboro at 42.6% compared to 35.2% in Montour falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Montour falls at 26.0% compared to 24.0% in Swainsboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Swainsboro Montour falls
No Schooling 1.9% (147) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.7% (1,264) 25.2% (399)
Less than High School 11.6% (879) 14.5% (230)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.6% (500) 15.5% (245)

Education Levels Comparison: Swainsboro vs Montour falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Swainsboro have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Montour falls.
  • In Montour falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.2% compared to 16.7% in Swainsboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Montour falls at 14.5%, compared to 11.6% in Swainsboro.
  • In Montour falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.