Demographics details for Swainsboro, GA vs American fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Swainsboro, GA vs American fork, UT.

Data Swainsboro American fork
Population 7,583 37,268
Median Age 30.1 years 28.0 years
Median Income $44,491 $90,490
Married Families 25.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 24% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Swainsboro vs American fork

  • The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 7,583 in Swainsboro.
  • Residents in Swainsboro have a higher median age of 30.1 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
  • In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 5% in American fork.
  • The unemployment rate in Swainsboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in American fork.

Demographics

Demographics Swainsboro vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Swainsboro American fork
Black 57 Data is updating
White 33 84
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 4 9
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Swainsboro vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Swainsboro at 57% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
  • In American fork, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Swainsboro.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
  • Both Swainsboro and American fork have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Swainsboro and American fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Swainsboro American fork
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 9.8%
Depression 20.6% 23.4%
Smoking 22.6% 6.7%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 8.5%
Obesity 42.6% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Swainsboro vs American fork

  • More residents in Swainsboro report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 20.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Swainsboro at 22.6% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Swainsboro at 13.6% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Swainsboro at 42.6% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Swainsboro American fork
No Schooling 1.9% (147) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 16.7% (1,264) 7.4% (2,742)
Less than High School 11.6% (879) 5.7% (2,134)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.6% (500) 21.3% (7,922)

Education Levels Comparison: Swainsboro vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of residents in Swainsboro have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Swainsboro hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • More residents in Swainsboro have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.