Environment details: Sutherland VA
Water quality acceptable; testing shows few issues.
Environment details: Logsden OR
Water quality good; generally clean resources.
Compare Environment: Sutherland VA vs Logsden OR
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Sutherland | Logsden |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 784 | 308 |
Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable; testing shows few issues. | Water quality good; generally clean resources. |
Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.57 | 1.57 |
Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 28 | 8 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sutherland vs Logsden
- The water quality in Logsden is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Sutherland.
- Logsden has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Sutherland.
- Both cities have the same average air quality index of 1.57.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Sutherland at 28 compared to 8 in Logsden.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.