Demographics details for Sutherland, VA vs Crook, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sutherland, VA vs Crook, CO.
Data | Sutherland | Crook |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,000 | 126 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 56.0 years |
Median Income | $60,000 | $23,500 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 21.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Sutherland vs Crook
- In Sutherland, the population is higher at 2,000, compared to 126 in Crook.
- The median age in Crook is higher at 56.0 years, compared to 45.0 years in Sutherland.
- Sutherland has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $23,500 in Crook.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sutherland at 60.0% compared to 21.0% in Crook.
- The poverty level is higher in Crook at 11%, compared to 10% in Sutherland.
- The unemployment rate in Sutherland is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.0% in Crook.
Demographics
Demographics Sutherland vs Crook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sutherland | Crook |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | Data is updating |
White | 80 | 90 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sutherland vs Crook
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sutherland at 10% compared to 0% in Crook.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crook at 90% compared to 80% in Sutherland.
- The Asian population is larger in Sutherland at 5% compared to 0% in Crook.
- Crook has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Sutherland.
- Both Sutherland and Crook have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sutherland and Crook at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sutherland | Crook |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.3% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.6% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 21.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.4% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sutherland vs Crook
- In Crook, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crook at 21.6% versus 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Crook has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crook at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- Crook has higher obesity rates at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crook at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sutherland | Crook |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.3% (18) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 20.6% (26) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.7% (11) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sutherland vs Crook
- In Crook, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- In Crook, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crook at 20.6%, compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
- In Crook, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 0.0% in Sutherland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.