Demographics details for Susanville, CA vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Susanville, CA vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Susanville | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,707 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $52,997 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Susanville vs Southlake
- The population in Southlake is higher at 31,102, compared to 13,707 in Susanville.
- The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 33.0% in Susanville.
- Susanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Susanville is higher at 7.0%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Susanville vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Susanville | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 1 |
| White | 29 | 68 |
| Asian | 2 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Susanville vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Susanville at 16% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 29% in Susanville.
- In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 2% in Susanville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Susanville at 33% compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Susanville at 17% compared to 5% in Southlake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Susanville at 3% compared to 0% in Southlake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Susanville | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Susanville vs Southlake
- More residents in Susanville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Southlake at 21.3% versus 18.1% in Susanville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Susanville at 17.9% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 18.5% in Susanville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Susanville at 32.9% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Susanville at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Susanville | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (170) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (2,613) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 39.3% (5,387) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (962) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Susanville vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Susanville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Susanville hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Susanville have less than a high school education at 39.3% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.