Demographics details for Susanville, CA vs Lathrup village, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Susanville, CA vs Lathrup village, MI.

Data Susanville Lathrup village
Population 13,707 4,025
Median Age 33.7 years 48.2 years
Median Income $52,997 $97,750
Married Families 33.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 7.0 3.7

Population Comparison: Susanville vs Lathrup village

  • In Susanville, the population is higher at 13,707, compared to 4,025 in Lathrup village.
  • The median age in Lathrup village is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
  • Lathrup village has a higher median income of $97,750, compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
  • In Lathrup village, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Susanville.
  • Susanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Lathrup village.
  • The unemployment rate in Susanville is higher at 7.0%, compared to 3.7% in Lathrup village.

Demographics

Demographics Susanville vs Lathrup village provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Susanville Lathrup village
Black 16 67
White 29 27
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 33 4
Two or More Races 17 2
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Susanville vs Lathrup village

  • In Lathrup village, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 16% in Susanville.
  • Susanville has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 27% in Lathrup village.
  • The Asian population is larger in Susanville at 2% compared to 0% in Lathrup village.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Susanville at 33% compared to 4% in Lathrup village.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Susanville at 17% compared to 2% in Lathrup village.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Susanville at 3% compared to 0% in Lathrup village.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Susanville Lathrup village
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 14.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 9.0%
Depression 18.1% 17.5%
Smoking 17.9% 13.0%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 16.0%
Obesity 32.9% 36.0%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Susanville vs Lathrup village

  • More residents in Susanville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Lathrup village.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Susanville at 18.1% compared to 17.5% in Lathrup village.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Susanville at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Lathrup village.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Susanville at 18.5% compared to 16.0% in Lathrup village.
  • Lathrup village has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 32.9% in Susanville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lathrup village at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Susanville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Susanville Lathrup village
No Schooling 1.2% (170) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.1% (2,613) 12.5% (502)
Less than High School 39.3% (5,387) 4.5% (183)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (962) 36.7% (1,479)

Education Levels Comparison: Susanville vs Lathrup village

  • A higher percentage of residents in Susanville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Lathrup village.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Susanville hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 12.5% in Lathrup village.
  • More residents in Susanville have less than a high school education at 39.3% compared to 4.5% in Lathrup village.
  • In Lathrup village, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.