Demographics details for Susanville, CA vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Susanville, CA vs Fort thomas, KY.
Data | Susanville | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,707 | 17,133 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $52,997 | $95,391 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Susanville vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 13,707 in Susanville.
- The median age in Fort thomas is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Susanville.
- Susanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Susanville is higher at 7.0%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Susanville vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Susanville | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | 2 |
White | 29 | 92 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 33 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Susanville vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Susanville at 16% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort thomas at 92% compared to 29% in Susanville.
- The Asian population is larger in Susanville at 2% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Susanville at 33% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Susanville at 17% compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Susanville at 3% compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Susanville | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.7% |
Depression | 18.1% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 13.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Susanville vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Susanville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort thomas at 26.2% versus 18.1% in Susanville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Susanville at 17.9% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Susanville at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Susanville at 32.9% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort thomas at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Susanville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Susanville | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (170) | 0.4% (66) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (2,613) | 10.7% (1,840) |
Less than High School | 39.3% (5,387) | 3.3% (569) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (962) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Susanville vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of residents in Susanville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Susanville hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Susanville have less than a high school education at 39.3% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.