Demographics details for Surprise, AZ vs Wahpeton, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Surprise, AZ vs Wahpeton, ND.
| Data | Surprise | Wahpeton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,198 | 8,014 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 34.0 years |
| Median Income | $87,756 | $51,417 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Surprise vs Wahpeton
- In Surprise, the population is higher at 154,198, compared to 8,014 in Wahpeton.
- Residents in Surprise have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 34.0 years in Wahpeton.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756 compared to $51,417 in Wahpeton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Surprise at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Wahpeton.
- Surprise has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Wahpeton.
- The unemployment rate in Surprise is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Wahpeton.
Demographics
Demographics Surprise vs Wahpeton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Surprise | Wahpeton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 63 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Surprise vs Wahpeton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Surprise at 5% compared to 2% in Wahpeton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wahpeton at 87% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- The Asian population is larger in Surprise at 2% compared to 0% in Wahpeton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Surprise at 20% compared to 3% in Wahpeton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Surprise at 9% compared to 4% in Wahpeton.
- In Wahpeton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Surprise.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Surprise | Wahpeton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 22.4% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Surprise vs Wahpeton
- More residents in Surprise report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Wahpeton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wahpeton at 21.0% versus 20.1% in Surprise.
- Wahpeton has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wahpeton at 22.4% compared to 18.5% in Surprise.
- Wahpeton has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wahpeton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Surprise | Wahpeton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (754) | 0.1% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (21,050) | 11.1% (886) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (11,792) | 7.7% (621) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (30,735) | 13.5% (1,085) |
Education Levels Comparison: Surprise vs Wahpeton
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Wahpeton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 11.1% in Wahpeton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wahpeton at 7.7%, compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Surprise hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 13.5% in Wahpeton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.